Next: 3.7.2 Explicit computation of
Up: 3.7 General solution of
Previous: 3.7 General solution of
3.7.1 Ramaswami's formula
From Eqs.(3.22) and (3.24) and the aid of
matrix
, we derive Ramaswami's recursive formula [75],
which is numerically stable because it entails only additions and
multiplications3.6.
Ramaswami's formula defines the following recursive relation among
stationary probability vectors
for
:
 |
(3.26) |
where, letting
, matrices
and
are
defined as follows:
 |
(3.27) |
Observe that the above auxiliary sums represent the last column
in the infinitesimal generator
defined in Eq.(3.20).
We can express them in terms of matrices
defined in Eq.(3.24)
as follows:
Given the above definition of
for
and the normalization
condition, a unique vector
can be obtained by solving the following
system of
linear equations, i.e., the cardinality of set
:
![\begin{displaymath}
\mbox{\boldmath {$\pi$}}^{(0)} \left[
\left( \widehat{{\ma...
...ight)^{-1} {\mathbf{1}}^T
\right]
= [{\mathbf{0}}~\vert~1],
\end{displaymath}](img441.gif) |
(3.28) |
where
the symbol ``
'' indicates that we discard one (any) column
of the corresponding matrix, since we added a column representing the
normalization condition. Once
is known, we can then iteratively
compute
for
, stopping when the accumulated probability mass is close
to one. After this point, measures of interest can be computed. Since the
relation between
for
is not straightforward, computation
of measures of interest require generation of the entire stationary probability
vector.
Next: 3.7.2 Explicit computation of
Up: 3.7 General solution of
Previous: 3.7 General solution of
Alma Riska
2003-01-13